<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Speed up your Windows 7 using Readyboost feature.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.messagingblogs.com/2009/06/22/speed-up-your-windows-7-using-readyboost-feature.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.messagingblogs.com/2009/06/22/speed-up-your-windows-7-using-readyboost-feature.html</link>
	<description>Peep into Breaking Technology buzz and share our opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 00:59:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maj</title>
		<link>http://www.messagingblogs.com/2009/06/22/speed-up-your-windows-7-using-readyboost-feature.html/comment-page-1#comment-112944</link>
		<dc:creator>Maj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 00:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.messagingblogs.com/?p=251#comment-112944</guid>
		<description>Windows 7 and Vista only use ReadyBoost if there is 512MB or less system RAM installed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows 7 and Vista only use ReadyBoost if there is 512MB or less system RAM installed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.messagingblogs.com/2009/06/22/speed-up-your-windows-7-using-readyboost-feature.html/comment-page-1#comment-57883</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.messagingblogs.com/?p=251#comment-57883</guid>
		<description>Good info, I have developed an interest in readyboost after getting a netbook, although my msi L2100 is fast, faster and more efficient wouldnt hurt :)

I did notice a faster load time and snappier feel when testing a 1GB usb drive on my desktop with 2GB ram. Im glad because I thought I would need something more like a 16GB ssd through mini pci-e on the netbook to keep it discrete and practical but instead 4GB SD is what I got and in the slot I will rarely ever use if that is much better. Now the pci-e slot will go to a HD decoder :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good info, I have developed an interest in readyboost after getting a netbook, although my msi L2100 is fast, faster and more efficient wouldnt hurt <img src='http://www.messagingblogs.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I did notice a faster load time and snappier feel when testing a 1GB usb drive on my desktop with 2GB ram. Im glad because I thought I would need something more like a 16GB ssd through mini pci-e on the netbook to keep it discrete and practical but instead 4GB SD is what I got and in the slot I will rarely ever use if that is much better. Now the pci-e slot will go to a HD decoder <img src='http://www.messagingblogs.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Augustus Thoo</title>
		<link>http://www.messagingblogs.com/2009/06/22/speed-up-your-windows-7-using-readyboost-feature.html/comment-page-1#comment-57450</link>
		<dc:creator>Augustus Thoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 06:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.messagingblogs.com/?p=251#comment-57450</guid>
		<description>2 days ago, I found a 1GB thumb-drive in my drawer, a freebie from attending an IT security seminar some time ago.

So, I go about ReadyBoost-ing it on my Win7 desktop. Really noticed the improvement during after logging in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2 days ago, I found a 1GB thumb-drive in my drawer, a freebie from attending an IT security seminar some time ago.</p>
<p>So, I go about ReadyBoost-ing it on my Win7 desktop. Really noticed the improvement during after logging in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Kerns</title>
		<link>http://www.messagingblogs.com/2009/06/22/speed-up-your-windows-7-using-readyboost-feature.html/comment-page-1#comment-57136</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Kerns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.messagingblogs.com/?p=251#comment-57136</guid>
		<description>One correction.

In Windows 7, Readyboost is not actually limited to 4GB. Instead, that limitation comes from the FAT32 filesystem.

If you reformat a larger flash card with exFAT or NTFS, it can create and use larger cache files. I&#039;m currently using all of an 8GB card. I&#039;ve got a fast 32GB card on order. Supposedly you can use up to 256 GB spread across multiple drives. I suspect even with my disk- and memory- intensive usage patterns, 32GB even is overkill.

My subjective experience is also that my system is much faster. But until recently I was running Vista, and some may just be improvements to Windows 7, especially Superfetch. But SOMETHING is caching data so that Google Chrome can come up Really Amazingly Quickly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One correction.</p>
<p>In Windows 7, Readyboost is not actually limited to 4GB. Instead, that limitation comes from the FAT32 filesystem.</p>
<p>If you reformat a larger flash card with exFAT or NTFS, it can create and use larger cache files. I&#8217;m currently using all of an 8GB card. I&#8217;ve got a fast 32GB card on order. Supposedly you can use up to 256 GB spread across multiple drives. I suspect even with my disk- and memory- intensive usage patterns, 32GB even is overkill.</p>
<p>My subjective experience is also that my system is much faster. But until recently I was running Vista, and some may just be improvements to Windows 7, especially Superfetch. But SOMETHING is caching data so that Google Chrome can come up Really Amazingly Quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
